UPPER COLCA


UPPER COLCA ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH PROJECT
Arequipa, Peru

THEORETICAL ISSUES

The Colca Valley in southern Peru was a primary source of obsidian for people in the south-central Andes for over 8,000 years (Brooks, et al. 1997; Burger, et al. 1998; Burger, et al. 2000). Obsidian of this type was used by early foraging groups and continued to be procured and exchanged by people in significant quantities through the Formative Period and into the Middle Horizon. 

Over a century of archaeological research in the Lake Titicaca Basin, 200km to the east of the Colca, has shown that obsidian from the Chivay area was exchanged and was used in both utilitarian and ceremonial contexts. Despite the presence of high quality cherts and other materials in the immediate vicinity of these sites a considerable effort was expended to bring Chivay obsidian to the Titicaca Basin. Over 90% of all the prehistoric obsidian that has been sourced in the Titicaca Basin is from the Colca Valley (Aldenderfer 2002, Burger, et al. 2000). As many of the goods utilized in the Titicaca Basin were perishable and are not presently available to archaeologists, obsidian serves as a durable measure of changes in the ability of prehistoric people to move resources in the south-central Andes.   

This project will document shifts in the acquisition and initial processing of the obsidian at the source itself. Both system-based and actor-based models have been proposed for the rise of complex societies, both will be considered here. 


i. Project Overview
ii. Theoretical Issues
iii. Methodology Description
iv. NSF Proposal Summary


Are changes in the production, exchange and use of this obsidian best explained by conceiving of the process as system-based, as that of a more efficient structure resulting in distinct class of managers, those who were ultimately the ruling elite during the Late Formative and Middle Horizon? Or is the extraction, production, exchange and display of this obsidian better understood as the result of decisions by individuals in an actor-based view where possession of this visible, non-local stone material may have represented distant social ties, access to resources and power, and was part of a individual's strategy for gaining social influence? Inclusive theories have also been proposed that position individual behavior within a systemic context. 

The focus of this project is prehistoric stone processing behavior in the vicinity of the obsidian quarry. Variability in production behavior, degree of reduction in the vicinity of the stone material quarry, and the degree of reduction of debitage in the settlement region will contribute to better understanding of changes in the obsidian production system prehistorically. 

This project will evaluate the hypothesis that with  the development of social ranking in the south-central Andes the procurement and exchange of obsidian was increasingly channeled through local procurement and then distributed through exchange, resulting in a less variable obsidian production system. When stratified societies appeared in the Titicaca Basin during the Late Formative Period and the Middle Horizon, direct control of the obsidian resource by 

the distant polity may have occurred; this is a question that is best explored through further research in the vicinity of the source. The development of trade networks involving llama caravans as burden-bearers would have facilitated long-distance movement and control of raw materials by the Late Formative Period and onwards (Browman 1990, Nuñez 1979).

Temporal assignment is a major challenge in archaeological research at quarries. Even if we can detect changes in processing strategies, how do we know when these changes occurred? A time-sensitive projectile point chronology for the region (Klink and Aldenderfer, 2005) will permit the assignment of time periods to sites identified on survey containing projectile points. Test excavations are planned three sites, these test units may discover datable stratigraphy that help to put changes in reduction strategies in debitage into a cultural or temporal context. Finally, the region is volcanically active and regular depositions of ash will facilitate identifying stratigraphy and establishing contemporaneity.

The connection between the changes in the acquisition, processing and distribution of obsidian and social-cultural changes taking place regionally are summarized below.

The role of exchange in the progression towards a social stratification in the prehispanic Andean highlands will be investigated in this project. Exchange in known to play a central role in nearly all societies from mobile foragers (Wiessner 2002) to complex states (Adams 1974), this project will contribute to a better understanding of the dynamic relationship between exchange and social complexity in prehistory.


Previous - i. Project Overview

Next - iii. Methdology Description


Projection Description Pages

i. Project Overview
ii. Theoretical Issues
iii. Methodology Description
iv. NSF Proposal Summary

References Cited


Adams, Robert McCormick
1974 Anthropological perspectives on trade. Current Anthropology 15(3):239-258.

Aldenderfer, Mark S.
2002, Late Preceramic cultural complexity in the Lake Titicaca basin. Paper presented at the 67th Society for American Archaeology meetings, Denver, CO.

Brooks, Sarah O., Glascock, Michael D., & Giesso, Martin
1997 Source of volcanic glass for ancient Andean tools. Nature 376:449-450.

Browman, David L.
1990 Camelid Pastoralism in the Andes: Llama Caravan Fleteros, and Their Importance in Production and Distribution. In Nomads in a Changing World, edited by P. C. Salzman and J. G. Galaty, pp. 395-438. Istituto Universitario Orientale, Naples.

Burger, Richard L., Asaro, Frank, Salas, Guido, & Stross, Fred
1998 The Chivay obsidian source and the geological origin of Titicaca Basin type obsidian artifacts. Andean Past 5:203-223.

Burger, Richard L., Mohr Chávez, Karen L., & Chávez, Sergio J.
2000 Through the glass darkly: Prehispanic obsidian procurement and exchange in southern Peru and northern Bolivia. Journal of World Prehistory 14(3):267-362.

Ericson, Jonathon E.
1984 Towards the analysis of lithic production systems. In Prehistoric quarries and lithic production, edited by J. E. Ericson and B. A. Purdy, pp. 1-10. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Klink, Cynthia, & Aldenderfer, Mark.
2005. A Projectile Point Chronology for the South-Central Andean Highlands. In Advances in Titicaca Basin Archaeology - 1, edited by C. Stanish, A. Cohen, and M. Aldenderfer. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, Los Angeles, California.

Nuñez, Lautaro, & Dillehay, Tom D.
1979 Movilidad Giratoria, Armonía Social y Desarrollo en los Andes Meridionales: Patrones de Tráfico e Interacción Económica. Universidad de Chile, Antofagasta.

Torrence, Robin
1986 Production and Exchange of Stone Tools Prehistoric Obsidian in the Aegean. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Wiessner, Polly
2002 The vines of complexity. Current Anthropology 43(2):233-269.