%0 Book Section
%B Multiple approaches to the study of bifacial technologies
%D 2003
%T Biface technological development and variability in the Acheulian Industrial Complex in the Middle Awash region of Afar Rift, Ethiopia
%A Schick, Kathy,
%A J. Desmond Clark
%E University of Pennsylvania
%E Museum of Archaeology
%E Anthropology
%C Philadelphia
%I University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology
%K Paleolithic period.
%K Prehistoric.
%K Projectile points.
%K Stone implements.
%K Tools
%L SHLDS-GEN GN799.T6ANTH G
%P 1-30
%Z edited by Marie Soressi and Harold L. Dibble.1 BIFACE TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND VARIABILITY IN THE ACHEULEANINDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IN THE MIDDLE AWASH REGION OF THE AFAR RIFT,ETHIOPIAKathy Schick and J. Desmond Clark . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ACHEULEAN BIFACES AND EARLY HUMAN BEHAVIORAL PATTERNS IN EASTAFRICA AND SOUTH INDIAMichael P. Noll and Michael D. Petraglia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 TECHNOLOGICAL AND TYPOLOGICAL VARIABILITY IN THE BIFACES FROMTABUN CAVE, ISRAELShannon P. McPherron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554 BIFACIAL TOOLS IN THE LOWER AND MIDDLE PALEOLITHIC OF THE CAUCASUSAND THEIR CONTEXTSVladimir Doronichev and Lubov Golovanova . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 775 BIFACES AND RAW MATERIALS: FLEXIBLE FLAKING IN THE BRITISH EARLYPALEOLITHICNick Ashton and Mark White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1096 MANUFACTURE, TRANSPORT, AND USE OF MOUSTERIAN BIFACES: A CASESTUDY FROM THE PÉRIGORD (FRANCE)Marie Soressi and Maureen A. Hays . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125CONTENTS7 FROM BIFACES TO LEAF POINTSJanusz K. Kozlowski . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1498 SOLUTREAN LAUREL LEAF POINT PRODUCTION AND RAW MATERIALPROCUREMENT DURING THE LAST GLACIAL MAXIMUM IN SOUTHERNEUROPE: TWO EXAMPLES FROM CENTRAL FRANCE AND PORTUGALThierry Aubry, Miguel Almeida, Maria João Neves, andBertrand Walter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1659 THE PITFALLS OF USING BIFACES AS CULTURAL MARKERSMarcel Otte . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18310 DEFORMATION MODELING: A METHODOLOGY FOR THE ANALYSIS OFHANDAXE MORPHOLOGY AND VARIABILITYApril Nowell, Kyoungju Park, Dimitris Metaxas, andJinah Park . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19311 RETHINKING THE ROLE OF BIFACIAL TECHNOLOGY IN PALEOINDIANADAPTATIONS ON THE GREAT PLAINSDouglas B. Bamforth . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20912 TETHERED TO STONE OR FREEDOM TO MOVE: FOLSOM BIFACE TECHNOLOGYIN REGIONAL PERSPECTIVEJack L. Hofman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22913 TIME AS SEQUENCE,TYPE AS IDEAL: WHOLE-OBJECT MEASUREMENT OFBIFACE SIZE AND FORM IN MIDWESTERN NORTH AMERICAMichael J. Shott . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25114 AN OVERVIEW, WITH SOME THOUGHTS ON THE STUDY OF BIFACESDerek A. Roe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
%7 1st
%@ 1931707421 (alk. paper)